If you are a federal employee who has been recently terminated, we want to hear from you. Complete a case inquiry today.

  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Seldon Bofinger & Associates, P.C.

Advancing individual rights and liberties

  • Home
  • Our Attorneys
    • Bob Seldon
    • Charlene Bofinger
    • Angela St. Pierre
  • Principal Practice Areas
    • Employment Discrimination Law
    • Disability Law
    • Whistleblower Protection
    • Wage and Hour Violations
    • False Claims Protection
    • Trial Consultant
  • Case Inquiry
  • Cases Of Note
  • Blog
  • Español

Journal

Reasonable accommodation for employees at higher risk for severe illness from COVID-19

June 2, 2020 By SBA

Johnsenia Brooks

Every day as more research is conducted, all of us are trying mitigate any chance we have of contracting the COVID-19 virus — by maintaining a 6-foot distance from others, regularly handwashing, and wearing a mask or face covering, among other measures recommended by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). 

Based on currently available information and clinical expertise, however, older adults and people of any age who have serious underlying medical conditions might be at higher risk for severe illness from COVID-19.

Individuals considered high-risk for severe illness from COVID-19 include:

  • People 65 years and older
  • People who live in a nursing home or long-term care facility

People of all ages with underlying medical conditions, particularly if not well controlled, including:

  • Chronic lung disease or moderate to severe asthma
  • Serious heart conditions
  • A compromised immune system caused by, but not limited to cancer treatment, smoking, bone marrow or organ transplantation, immune deficiencies, poorly controlled HIV or AIDS, and prolonged use of corticosteroids and other immune weakening medications
  • Severe obesity
  • Diabetes
  • Chronic kidney disease; and
  • Liver disease

Requesting Reasonable Accommodation 

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has updated its guidelines to help employees request a reasonable accommodation due to being at a higher risk of severe illness from COVID-19.  

An employee – or a third party, such as an employee’s doctor – must let the employer know that he or she needs an accommodation for a reason related to a medical condition (here, the underlying condition the CDC considers high-risk for severe illness from COVID-19).  Individuals may request accommodation in conversation or in writing. The employee (or third party) does not need to use the term “reasonable accommodation” or reference the Americans with Disabilities Act in order to request an accommodation. 

After receiving a request, the employer may ask questions or seek medical documentation to help evaluate if the individual has a disability and if there is a reasonable accommodation, barring undue hardship, that can be provided. 

Accommodations that could be offered for individuals at higher risk for severe illness from COVID-19 include:

  1. Additional or enhanced protective gowns, masks, gloves, or other gear beyond what the employer may generally provide to employees returning to its workplace;
  2. Erecting a barrier that provides separation between an employee with a disability and coworkers/the public;
  3. Increasing the space between an employee with a disability and others;  
  4. Eliminating or substituting particular job duties that are not considered “essential” functions of a particular position;
  5. Temporary modification of work schedules if it would decrease contact with coworkers and/or the public when on duty or commuting;
  6. Moving the location where the employee performs his or her work if it provides more social distancing

While these are some options to consider, an effective accommodation depends, among other things, on an employee’s job duties and the design of the workspace. Employers and employees are encouraged to be creative and flexible during these uncertain times to ensure that employees can still with while still mitigating risks. If you believe you may qualify for a reasonable accommodation based on being at higher risk for COVID-19, or for any other reason, contact one of our attorneys at Seldon Bofinger to schedule an initial consultation. 

Last edited May 7, 2020

Filed Under: Journal

EEOC Approves Testing Employees for COVID-19 Before Returning to the Workforce

June 2, 2020 By SBA

The federal government’s social distancing guidelines expired at the end of April and many states have re-opened their economies, albeit at limited capacities. As more and more employers are preparing to re-open work spaces, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) offered more guidance concerning COVID-19. 

As of April 23, 2020 employers now have the ability to medically test their employees for COVID-19 before allowing them to enter the workplace–not just temperature checks as was originally advised. The EEOC reasoned that mandatory medical tests of employees are permitted under the Americans with Disabilities Act when they are job-related and consistent with business necessity. This new addition is reasonable considering that some people with COVID-19 do not have a fever or experience symptoms. 

The Best Testing Practices

COVID-19 testing is meant to reduce the “direct threat” the coronavirus poses to the health of others. If an employer chooses to administer COVID-19 tests, they should do so in a consistent, non-discriminatory manner. Employees cannot be singled out for special testing on the basis of race, sex, religion, or other protected characteristics.

It is the employer’s responsibility to ensure that tests used are administered by trained personnel or a third party professional, reliable and accurate, that the appropriate consent and disclosures are obtained to share data between the medical provider and the business, and that the records are treated as confidential medical records, all consistent with Americans with Disabilities Act standards. Employers are encouraged to use guidance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration about what may or may not be considered safe and accurate testing, as well as guidance from CDC or other public health authorities, and check for updates, periodically. As of the publication of this post, the EEOC has remained silent on the issue of who bears the cost of COVID-19 testing and did not suggest the use of other tests, such as antibodies tests.

COVID-19 Testing Practices in Collaboration with other practices 

Employers may wish to consider the incidence of false-positives or false-negatives. Accurate testing can only reveal if the virus is currently present and a negative test does not mean the employee will not acquire the virus later. Based on guidance from medical and public health authorities, employers should still require – to the greatest extent possible – that employees observe CDC workplace practices, such as social distancing, regular handwashing, and other measures, to prevent transmission of COVID-19.       Last edited May 6, 2020

Filed Under: Journal

Taking Time off from Work to Care for a Family Member Sick with COVID-19

June 2, 2020 By SBA

Johnsenia Brooks

Anxiety produced by COVID-19 has been growing exponentially, much like the number of people infected with the virus each day. The biggest hope we could have for our family members and loved ones is that the chances of infection remain even more distant than the 6 feet we keep from each other. However, virus spread projections have instilled in us a new fear of getting infected and we cannot fall victims to being ill-prepared. Luckily, for many employees, new provisions have extended laws that were meant to protect the family unit without requiring employees to choose between their jobs and taking care of a loved one.

The federal Family & Medical Leave Act (FMLA) allows a qualified employee to take up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave within a 12-month period if they or an immediate family member requires care for a “serious health condition.” The fundamental principle of this law protects employees from having to choose between the job they need and the family members in need of their care.

The law also guarantees that a qualified employee continues receiving health insurance benefits and requires their employer to offer them the same or equivalent position when they return. Qualified employees are defined as individuals who have worked for at least one year, over 1,250 hours in the prior year, and whose employer has at least 50 employees in a 75-mile radius.

The Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) allows employees who work for employers of less than 500 employees to take up to 80 hours of paid emergency sick leave. An employee may take emergency sick leave under the FFCRA if they are:

  1. Caring for an individual who is subject to a Federal, State, or local quarantine or isolation order related to COVID-19 ;
  2. Advised by a health care provider to self-quarantine due to concerns related to COVID-19;
  3. Experiencing symptoms of COVID-19 and seeking a medical diagnosis;
  4. Caring for a child whose school or place of care is closed, or child care provider is unavailable, due to COVID-19 related reasons; or
  5. Experiencing any other conditions, as specified by the Secretary of Health and Human Services.

The rate of pay varies depending on the circumstances, and more information is available through the Department of Labor. The FFCRA’s paid leave provisions are effective on April 1, 2020, and apply to leave taken between April 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020.Local and state laws may provide even greater protections for employees. Click for information regarding protections for employees in Washington D.C., Maryland, and Virginia.

Filed Under: Journal

Important Changes to the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic

March 31, 2020 By SBA

Everyone is anxiously following the latest news about the coronavirus world-wide pandemic. Changes to our daily lives and our workplaces can feel overwhelming, and employee rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act have been affected.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has officially designated the COVID-19 virus a pandemic, and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has determined that COVID-19 is a “direct threat,” meaning that having an employee with the virus, or even symptoms of it, in the workplace could cause substantial harm. The combination of the WHO and CDC designations automatically triggered changes to some rights under the ADA for private workers and the Rehabilitation Act for federal employees; however, those changes do not include using COVID-19 as an excuse to discriminate.

Under normal circumstances, an employer cannot make disability-related inquiries or require medical examinations of applicants or employees, except in very limited circumstances. Those rules are now relaxed, and employers are permitted to take steps to prevent the spread of the virus, such as taking employees’ body temperatures, asking about recent travel, requiring employees to wear personal protective equipment, or sending symptomatic employees home. Employers may also screen job applicants for symptoms of COVID-19, delay a new hire’s start date, and in some circumstances, withdraw the job offer.

Employers are still required to provide reasonable accommodation during a pandemic unless a disabled employee poses a direct threat, even with the reasonable accommodation. The EEOC has encouraged employers and employees to use interim solutions, such as telework, to enable employees to continue working. The EEOC’s guidance can be found at https://www.eeoc.gov/facts/pandemic_flu.html on these and other changes to the ADA during a pandemic. The CDC has also posted about best practices that employers should follow to help curb the spread of the virus at https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/guidance-business-response.html.

If you have concerns about your rights as an employee being violated during the pandemic, we’d be glad to consult with you.

Filed Under: Journal Tagged With: Creatives

Getting a New Position

October 1, 2016 By SBA

This is a sample caption.

GETTING REASSIGNED

       The EEOC is clear that when an employee asks to be reassigned as part of a request for Reasonable Accommodation, the employer has to look for a new position – and that doesn’t mean just in your department, but everywhere.  If you work for a large employer, that may really work to your advantage if you are qualified for positions that exist in multiple parts of an agency or a business. 

       A reassignment is not easy to get as an RA.  It has to be an accommodation of last resort.  But that doesn’t mean a new job is out of reach.  And if you’ve been harassed at the workplace and devastated by it, getting reassigned away from a supervisor may be the only accommodation that works.

Filed Under: Journal Tagged With: Creatives

RA and Your New Supervisor

October 1, 2016 By SBA

This is a sample caption.

You fought long and hard for your Reasonable Accommodation with medical reports attesting to your disability – maybe it’s from the harassment you suffered at work or injuries and anxieties you sustained because of your military service.  Your former supervisor finally got it but now that person moved on and you have a new supervisor, someone who just can’t get his or her head around the idea that you are teleworking more than a minimal amount.  Maybe a leave restriction is being held over your head.

Never mind that your physician signed off on a statement that this is an absolute necessity for you to manage your symptoms and that having to go through all this scrutiny and uncertainty again is very unhealthy for you.  The EEOC and the ADA protect disabled employees from just this sort of arbitrary reconsideration and possible revocation of RA.  When you request renewal or extension of RA, you will probably have to provide your employer with limited, tailored information to show that nothing significant has changed and that you still need the same RA or a modified one.  But that type of a request does not trigger the start of the RA process all over again and you shouldn’t be put through this.

Filed Under: Journal Tagged With: Technology

RA and Your Supervisor

October 1, 2016 By SBA

You are of course usually required to support your request for Reasonable Accommodation with a medical report and records.  Sometimes this includes having a physician working for your employer review and evaluate your medical records.  That’s to be understood and a regular part of the RA process and sometimes a physician .  What is not a part of the process is your supervisor demanding to see your medical records.  Your employer and any physician they hire has to keep your medical records in strict confidence and away from your managers.  Supervisors only entitled to have information necessary to evaluate your workplace limitations and the feasibility of necessary accommodations.  Don’t be cowed into giving them more than that.

Filed Under: Journal Tagged With: Work

Robert Seldon
Rated by Super Lawyers


loading ...

Footer

Seldon Bofinger & Associates, P.C., Attorneys-At-Law

 

1319 F Street, N.W.,
Suite 200
Washington, DC 20004

phone: 202-393-8200
fax: 202-318-2287

Copyright © 2025 Robert C. Seldon Esq. · Website Developed and Maintained by Aledor